Upper and lower points
Moderators: Pedro Egea, jeffbyerley
Upper and lower points
Just to double check, the 1600 mm measurement is taken from the bottom of the upper limit mark to the top of the lower limit mark, right?
Thanks
Don
Thanks
Don
Don Case
Can 271
Vancouver Island B.C.
Can 271
Vancouver Island B.C.
-
- USA NCA Officer
- Posts: 768
- Joined: 25 Nov 2003, 00:06
- Sail number: USA 16
- Club: Famous Potatoes Sailing Club
- Design: Brit Pop
- Location: USA 16
-
- Posts: 354
- Joined: 21 Apr 2007, 17:54
- Sail number: CAN 46
- Club: VMSS
- Design: V8
- Location: Vancouver Island, BC, Canada
-
- USA NCA Officer
- Posts: 768
- Joined: 25 Nov 2003, 00:06
- Sail number: USA 16
- Club: Famous Potatoes Sailing Club
- Design: Brit Pop
- Location: USA 16
actually, you need an upper band - it can be at the top of the mast, but needs to be a contrasting stripe with its lower edge no more than 1600mm above the upper edge of the lower band. The lower edge of the middle band denotes the line above which a line extended up from the leading edge of the jib cannot go above.
Can we talk about the middle band for a sec. C.8.4 c 1 (however you write that) says a line from the tack to the head point------- . Can the attachment point be above the middle band? Because of the boom offset the jibstay makes a slight bend at the upper swivel. This causes the jibstay to contact the mast above the C.8.4.c.1 line. I believe that I could put the attachment point on or slightly above the C.8.4.c.1 line and still be within the rules. I realize it wouldn't buy me much but I am curious.
Thanks
Don
Thanks
Don
Don Case
Can 271
Vancouver Island B.C.
Can 271
Vancouver Island B.C.
-
- USA NCA Officer
- Posts: 768
- Joined: 25 Nov 2003, 00:06
- Sail number: USA 16
- Club: Famous Potatoes Sailing Club
- Design: Brit Pop
- Location: USA 16
No. The line that describes the leading edge of the jib (and thus the forestay) cannot intersect the leading edge of the mast above the lower edge of the middle band. I can't imagine how you could attach the jibstay to the mast above the midband and still comply with this measurement rule. Most folks put the hole in the mast into which the jibstay attaches a few mm below the bottom of the middle band.
I can describe it as my old rig was set up this way. The previous owner put a small pad eye attached to the mast just below the middle band. The head stay passed through the hole in the pad eye and then was attached a couple inches above the middle band. The line intersected the rig below the middle band, but the headstay way attached to the rig above the middle band.
Its only a practice rig so I dont know if it would be legal or not.
Regards,
Jim
Its only a practice rig so I dont know if it would be legal or not.
Regards,
Jim
Jim Thompson
IOM - USA 370 - Ericca
IOM - USA 370 - Ericca
-
- USA NCA Officer
- Posts: 768
- Joined: 25 Nov 2003, 00:06
- Sail number: USA 16
- Club: Famous Potatoes Sailing Club
- Design: Brit Pop
- Location: USA 16
Interesting question. I built a few rigs that way also, and is a nice way to make large forstay adjustments. From my (un-official) interpretation of the rule, it's legal, because the measurement is taken from the tack and head points of the sail, not including any rigging attachemnts.
(c) HEADSAIL
(1) A line taken through the tack point and the head point shall cut the
forward face of the mast spar lower than the lower edge of the
headsail stay limit mark at the fore side of the spar when the boom
spar is on the centreplane of the hull.
I suppose if the line goes up the spar, someone might make an argument that tensioning the line stiffens the upper portion of the spar and might be illegal. That's why I ran the line through an eye, then down the spar to terminate below the middle band.
(c) HEADSAIL
(1) A line taken through the tack point and the head point shall cut the
forward face of the mast spar lower than the lower edge of the
headsail stay limit mark at the fore side of the spar when the boom
spar is on the centreplane of the hull.
I suppose if the line goes up the spar, someone might make an argument that tensioning the line stiffens the upper portion of the spar and might be illegal. That's why I ran the line through an eye, then down the spar to terminate below the middle band.